SoyBooruIP 216.73.216.210 has been banned until the end of time because of VPN Detected
If you couldn't possibly be guilty of what you're banned for, the person we banned probably had a dynamic IP address and so do you.
See http://whatismyipaddress.com/dynamic-static for more information.
Image
Commenting
Comment Formatting Options
Want to report a comment? Report the post itself with relevant details.
Advertisement
Holy fail.
1- https://sunnah.com/ibnmajah:1877 7,9,18 2- https://sunnah.com/muslim:1422c 7,9,18 3- https://sunnah.com/muslim:1422d 6,9,18 4- https://sunnah.com/nasai:3258 9,18 5- https://sunnah.com/ibnmajah:1876 6,9 6- https://sunnah.com/abudawud:2121 7/6 ,9 7- https://sunnah.com/nasai:3256 7,9 8 - https://sunnah.com/nasai:3378 6,9 9- https://sunnah.com/nasai:3257 9, 9y 10- https://sunnah.com/nasai:3255 6,9 11- https://sunnah.com/bukhari:5134 6,9,9y 12- https://sunnah.com/bukhari:3894 6,9 13- https://sunnah.com/bukhari:5133 6,9,9y 14- https://sunnah.com/bukhari:5158 6,9,9y 15- https://sunnah.com/bukhari:3896 6,9 16- https://sunnah.com/muslim:1422a 6,9 17- https://sunnah.com/muslim:1422b 6,9
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MiupfAM3Sb5GNC9HkP58MbhYUQe2JW38-W9QuZ9e2o8/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVCZ4FjYL0g&t=0s
tabari GAINED knowlege about aisha from sahih hadithes and he even further from the prophet than bukhari
Appeal to authority fallacy, why would this video be reliable and how would it be lies? By the way, how would that be a bad thing? By the way Bukhari was already far enough with contradictions so how would it be reliable anyway? If its a contradiction then its false.
@Chud: Uh-huh, just like how I'd cave your fat nose in, you weakling. By the way, 6 MILLION.
Go ACK yourself fighting for crapestine instead of shitting up the 'ru with your autism geg
Holy copium this is actually sad, genuinely.
There is "strong" and "weak" hadiths. In sahih bukhari there is hadiths about how your pedo prophet forgeted quran one time lol. But hadiths about aisha considered "strong" by "big" mudslim scientist you retard and there different versions in 16 other collections.
You can also check comments to hadiths BY MUSLIMS YOU RETARD:
https://www.islamweb.net/ar/library/content/52/9382/%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D8%A5%D9%86%D9%83%D8%A7%D8%AD-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%AC%D9%84-%D9%88%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%87-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B5%D8%BA%D8%A7%D8%B1
She was nine when he raped her.
/pol/faggots do this on the daily geg
And even if it did happen it still pales in comparison to the amount of goyim deaths in ww2. Goycucks literally started the deadliest conflict in human history in an attempt to eradicate HebrewCHADS but failed and ended up killing 50 million of there own
I already told you that's not fallacious because there is evidence behind their claims. Okay so I can disagree? I've already heard all arguments for bukhari, reeeetaaard. Also I love how you copy my style to make yourself look more rhetorical but it just makes you look terrible.
Okay? And that goes off of consensus which is an appeal to popularity and appeal to authority fallacy and what does the "forgetting" thing have to do with what I just said? Also I dont care about their comments, they can come get destroyed in a debate too. There are also a whole bunch of muslims who disagree with the notion of her being 9. I already disproved her being 9, homo. Also its not "late" retard, its like 69 years after Bukhari, who's hadith is contradictory, when she was proven to be in fact, 19.
You're getting humiliated, go back to counting shekels with your nose.
Jews didnt even do it so its not wise to claim it as your win geg.
Retard they tried killing us first but failed lmao low iq shitskin go jump off a bridge geg
saaaar 6 million bad even doe 50 million is much heigher
Being an ignorant retard isn't winning lmao
Geg you are actually retarded poopslims blow themselves up everyday for allah lmao retarded shitskin you should do the same
50 million of combined groups of people doebeit.
What's gonna be the argument behind that I was ignorant?
And you guys get caught in those explosions and die geg.
Read more at https://askimam.org/public/question_detail/21031
Can you prove this source is reliable?
Yasir Qadhi (born January 30, 1975) is a Pakistani American Muslim scholar and theologian.
"all Muslims... don't apologise for the truth and don't distort the truth there aren't there are Muslims that try to deny this or he didn't marry Aisha as a young girl yeah actually look that's not the way forward we don't lie for the sake of our religion and stuff for Allah we have the truth we're not going to cover up the truth that people find it embarrassing this is the reality deal with it our prophet SAW and married a young girl and it was fine for the time"
This retard would get slammed in a debate by me GEEEG.
Also what was the spelling mistake you seething leaking shoashsala Hindu furry?
1. 'get your own head hit with a hammer'
2. 'ass furry'
@PisslamLostCommentifyouagree: What's gonna be the evidence of this?
The historical sources are also agreed that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) died when 'Aishah was eighteen years old, so at the time of the Hijrah she must have been nine years old.
The books of biography and history state that 'Aishah (may Allah be pleased with her) died at the age of sixty-three years, in 57 AH. So before the Hijrah her age was 6 years. So if you round up or down - as is the custom of the Arabs in counting years - they round up or down the first and last years, so her age at the time of the Hijrah was eight years, and her age at the time when the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) married her, eight months after the Hijrah, was nine years.
Didnt say that and can you prove that they are reliable? I keep asking you for evidence and you keep referring back to the sources themselves which is a begging the question fallacy.
Again, The well-known historian Ibn Jareer al-Tabari writes at page 50 of volume 4 of his 'Book of History': "Abu Bakr married two ladies in the days of ignorance. Fateelah daughter of Abd al-Aza was the first, from whom Abdullah and Asma were born. Umm-i-Rooman was the second, from whom Abd al-Rahman and Aisha were born. All the four children of Abu Bakr were born in the days of ignorance from the above-named two ladies.
It is a well-known fact of history, that Abu Bakr's son Abd al-Rahman fought against the Muslims in the battle of Badr. His age at that time was 21-22 years, and although he was older than Aisha, there is no evidence to show that the difference between their ages was more than three or four years. This fact lends support to the view that Aisha was born four or five years before the Call.
Now we know that Aisha was engaged by prophet Muhammad (p) in around 11th year of call (i.e.around 620 ad ) and consummated by marriage after three years i.e., around 623-624 a.d.. Now do the calculation the calculation . In 623 when Aisha's brother was 21-22 , at that time Aisha (r) was not less than 18-19 years .
Hence when Prophet Muhammad (p) engaged her in 620 ad she was around 16-17 years . Almost after 2-3 years Prophet (p) married her and took her to his home , which tends her age finally around 19
That's not really how the narrative went, its more that Allah summoned a look-a-like. But that's not even cowardice, we can debate theology in vc.
.....KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK!